On Aug 11, 4:27 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I am reading the README correctly, clj-8 is 10.8 times slower than > Java, but clj-9 does better: 3.2 times slower. > > Stu
You are reading that correctly. My clj-9 wasn't created until after fft1976's message starting this thread. Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
