On Aug 10, 11:42 pm, Jonathan Smith <jonathansmith...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The way your code is setup, you will spend a lot of time in funcall > overhead just because you used a lot of functions instead of doing the > calculation in bigger chunks. I thought, as I understood from Rich's lectures, JVM inlines whatever it wants. Anyway, I put everything inside a LET. In my tests my normal code (nbody_v2.clj) is 55x slower than Java, and yours is 40x slower. Andy's transients-using and type-declaring version is 37x slower (in his tests). After I put everything inside a LET, I get to be 52x slower than Java. Definitely not worth it, considering how ugly it is. Your version is not pure-functional, right? If so, I think I still have the fastest pure-functional and non-type declaring version. Let's just say that hacking Clojure's implementation of destructuring is against the rules. If it were a good idea, I'm sure Rich would have done it by now. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
