On Aug 6, 3:28 pm, André Thieme <splendidl...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 27 Jul., 23:26, AndyF <andy_finger...@alum.wustl.edu> wrote: > > Hello Andy, could you please update the following table? > > > > > | sbcl | perl | ghc | java | clj > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > mand- | wrong | out of | 32.7 | 28.6 | 340.4 > > elbrot | output | mem | 59.3 | 54.4 | 350.5 > > | | (?) | 0.8 | 0.4 | 4.7 > > > k-nuc- | 190.9 | 306.0 | 90.5 | 52.4 | 1677.6 (27m 57.6s) > > leotide | 187.9 | 302.7 | 130.8 | 89.6 | 2245.1 (37m 25.1s) > > | 2.4 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 24.2 ( 24.2s) > > When I understand you correctly, you now use Transients > in those benchmarks, which improved their runtime behaviour.
You are correct. I've updated that file: http://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-benchmarks/blob/bb9755bdeeccae84a9b09fbf34e45f6d45d4b627/RESULTS I've attempted to always put the best Clojure program results I've found so far on the same line with the run times for the programs in other languages, and then sometimes I will also include the second best Clojure results on a separate group of lines after that. Thanks, Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
