On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> > Hi, > > On Aug 3, 10:10 pm, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (defn and-ns > > "A non-short-circuiting \"and\" usable in reduce etc." > > ([] true) > > ([a] a) > > ([a b] (and a b)) > > ([a b & more] (reduce and-ns (and a b) more))) > > Don't think to complicated. > > (reduce #(and %1 %2) coll) > > This should do the trick, no? It's still non-short-circuiting, though. That will do the trick, but it's kind of ugly compared to just having a symbol for the first argument to reduce. > I think memfn is some relict like .., which pre-dates some > of the nice additions to clojure. > > #(.foo %1 %2 fixed-arg %3) What, you mean it predates the #(...) read-macro? I wouldn't know; I only started using Clojure when version 1.0 became available. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
