BTW, is definline still considered experimental (I know it is still mentioned in the doc, just asking whether it's up to date or not) ?
2009/7/30 Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> > > The documentation is explicit that definline observes defmacro-like > semantics. > > A.K.A. "What Rich said" :-) > > Stu > > > Hello, > > > > I am not sure to agree. > > > > If I get it right, definline is used to replace defn for function that > > we want to be inlined. > > > > So replacing defn by definline should have no impact on the semantic > > of > > the program. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Nicolas. > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 05:34 -0700, Rich Hickey wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Jul 30, 1:29 am, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> user=> (definline addsq [a b] `(+ (* ~a ~a) (* ~b ~b))) > >>> #'hxr.clj.util/addsq > >>> user=> (addsq (do (println "a evaluated") 1) 1) > >>> a evaluated > >>> a evaluated > >>> 2 > >> > >> You write the expansion, so you are in control of multiple > >> evaluation. > >> > >> Rich > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
