Rich, There have been a few times in this thread that people have tried to determine if a function was seqable, and used the following code
(seq? a-collection) While this code is great for determining if a-collection is a sequence, it is sometimes not what people want. Often the following code is meant to be used: (instance? clojure.lang.Seqable a-collection) I speculate that many people have something like the following code in their library collection: (defn seqable? "Returns true if (seq x) should work. That is, it tests if x implements clojure.lang.Seqable" [x] (instance? clojure.lang.Seqable x)) Could something like seqable? be added to core? Am I mistaken in the need for standardizing this function? Sean PS - Sorry if this isn't the right avenue for feature requests. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
