Hi, Am 14.07.2009 um 21:01 schrieb bgray:
Ok, so *if* this is intended behavior, what have people been doing to bind variables dependant on other bindings? I can't be the first to run into this.
I haven't run into this, but there are two obvious approaches: (let [new-a (compute n e w a)] (binding [a new-a b (inc new-a)] [a b])) (binding [a (comput n e w a)] (binding [b (inc a)] [a b])) I'm not sure it's intended, though. Consistency between the let-like forms and binding would be nice. Sincerely Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature