Hi,

Am 14.07.2009 um 21:01 schrieb bgray:

Ok, so *if* this is intended behavior, what have people been doing to
bind variables dependant on other bindings?  I can't be the first to
run into this.

I haven't run into this, but there are two obvious approaches:

(let [new-a (compute n e w a)]
  (binding [a new-a
            b (inc new-a)]
    [a b]))

(binding [a (comput n e w a)]
  (binding [b (inc a)]
    [a b]))

I'm not sure it's intended, though. Consistency between
the let-like forms and binding would be nice.

Sincerely
Meikel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to