Hi ! On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Jarkko Oranen <chous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 6:01 pm, Robert Campbell <rrc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I'm just curious why Christophe chose to return seq instead of a str > > for Enlive for his template functions. > > Most likely Enlive generates each of those fragments separately; > Forcing them into a single string at the end would wasteful in case > the user intends to write the output into a stream (which can be done > a fragment at a time.) Thus, leaving the choice to the user seems like > a good decision. Yes you are spot on: most of the time the resulting html is wrote into a stream (disk/network/pipe). This is also why I modified Ring to accept a seq of string as the body of a http response. Christophe -- Professional: http://cgrand.net/ (fr) On Clojure: http://clj-me.blogspot.com/ (en) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
