2009/7/10 Rowdy Rednose <rowdy.redn...@gmx.net>: > > The idea is to have all existing code (that gets recompiled after my > redefinition) benefit from my changes automatically, although I fear > it's not considered good style to do this.
Ah. Well, I've just tried: (in-ns 'clojure.core) (def old-dosync dosync) but it doesn't work: java.lang.Exception: Can't take value of a macro: #'clojure.core/dosync (NO_SOURCE_FILE:3) so I don't know how you would redefine the old one while still being able to refer to the new one without using another namespace. I suspect I'm just using insufficient imagination. -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
