There is a challenge on the blog of Tony Morris at
http://dibblego.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/haskell-scala-java-7-functional-java-java/#comment-2460.
It's a parsing problem for which he compares solutions in Haskell,
Scala and Java. I added a Clojure solution. I don't know if this is
the "best" way to solve this with Clojure, but it certainly works.
Here's my code, including unit tests.

(use 'clojure.test)

(defn- match [prev-char next-char]
  (condp = prev-char
    \( (= next-char \))
    \[ (= next-char \])
    false))

; Need a better name for this function.
(defn- helper [s stack]
  (if (empty? s)
    (empty? stack)
    (let [c (first s)
          top (first stack)
          stack (if (match top c) (next stack) (cons c stack))]
      (helper (next s) stack))))

(defn balanced? [s] (helper s '()))

(doseq [arg *command-line-args*]
  (println (balanced? arg)))

(deftest match-test
  (is (match \( \)))
  (is (match \[ \]))
  (is (not (match \( \{))))

(deftest balanced-test
  (is (balanced? "()"))
  (is (balanced? "[]"))
  (is (balanced? "([])"))
  (is (balanced? "[()]"))
  (is (balanced? "[]()"))
  (is (balanced? "[][[([])]]"))
  (is (not (balanced? "(")))
  (is (not (balanced? ")")))
  (is (not (balanced? "[")))
  (is (not (balanced? "]")))
  (is (not (balanced? "][")))
  (is (not (balanced? ")(")))
  (is (not (balanced? "( )")))
  (is (not (balanced? "([)")))
  (is (not (balanced? "[)]")))
  (is (not (balanced? "([)]")))
  (is (not (balanced? "({})")))
  (is (not (balanced? "[())]"))))

(run-tests)

-- 
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to