On Jun 28, 11:03 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > Now that doseq has similar capabilities, I think the situation you've > put forth (side effects and keeping lazy result) will be an extreme > minority case, and am inclined to think it would be better to require > and see the 'do' so you know something funky is going on.
Well, that error bit me when I was doing some debugging, which involved precisely putting a "println" into a "for" block. The results were being consumed more or less immediately. The net effect was to waste a little bit of my time. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
