Hi, Am 28.06.2009 um 07:45 schrieb Handkea fumosa:
It's list? that isn't.
No. list? is not broken. Every list is a seq, but not every seq is a list. Consider: (cons 0 (iterate inc 1)) This is no list! It's a sequence. Why should list? return true? In Clojure there is no such thing as a cons cell. There is only an abstraction of a cons cell where the second part must implement again the sequence abstraction. If you need a cons cell, use a two-element vector or a two-element list. Please: If you want to program CL in Clojure... Don't do it. Clojure is different. Claiming parts of Clojure are broken because they don't behave like something is else doesn't make sense and hence leads nowhere. If you want to try Clojure, make up your mind and learn Clojure's environment. Thinking Python/Perl/CL/whatever in Clojure will only hinder your progress with Clojure. If you find a bug, where a function violates its documented contract, please report it. Sincerely Meikel PS: This is no Clojure specific issue. Trying to learn Python and program it like one would in Clojure, also doesn't work...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
