On the Source tab, the "fork of" link tells you - that is, Rich's don't have that line, so it is the root. On the Network Members tab, it shows a tree of the forks, with Rich at the root.
You can browse all of the data in a repository through the website, so you shouldn't have to clone. And you only need to Fork (a github concept, not git), if you want to push something different to your own public clone. Ultimately, what matters to GIT is the sha1 commit keys, which tell you a commit/tree is identical to another or not. I don't think you can tell about clones other than by looking at the sha1s or the Fork graphs that github draws. The forks graph only tells you about the clones that github knows about. And as Alex says, being the root doesn't really mean master, authoritative, or best. -Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
