On 17.06.2009, at 08:36, Chris Dean wrote: > Sure. It's easy to write one's own version of get et.al. What's hard > to do is to get packages that you didn't write to use that version of > get. You need everyone to use c.c.generic.collection or all the > different libraries will have trouble interacting with each other.
Right. That's why I think Clojure should have a standard library, and multimethod versions of common functions should be in it. That's the only way to encourage the use of common interfaces. Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
