I know, but wouldn't it be nice to show that using Clojure you can write a solution that "really" works?
On Jun 10, 5:38 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see the solutions provided for other languages solving the > tail call problem. And I also don't see the problem explictly stating > that a tail call optimized version is required. > > It seems rather to me that the page just want to exhibit that the > language allows mutual recursion of calls, period ? > > So your first initial version seems sufficient. Look for example at > the java provided version, it suffers from the same StackTrace > problem. > > 2009/6/10 arasoft <t...@arasoft.de>: > > > > > Thank you for the answers. I now understand why this cannot work with > > trampoline. > > Is there another way to avoid stack overflow? I'd like to submit the > > code tohttp://rosettacode.org/wiki/Mutual_Recursionto improve the > > Clojure coverage and also to learn more stuff myself... > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
