Sounds like a candidate for the daily WTF...
On Jun 5, 12:54 pm, Daniel Jomphe <danieljom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You guessed mostly right, Daniel :) This guy hashed some fields of his
> client's database, replacing the original content with its hashed
> version. I don't know everything, but he at least obfuscated the
> addresses. He (and the client who asked to "encrypt with MD5") thought
> he was actually encrypting the data. :)))) And both didn't keep any
> backup. And there's lots of important data implied. That's indeed a
> very, very funny story. At least on my side of the story, since my ass
> is not on stake here :)
>
> On Jun 5, 12:43 pm, Daniel Lyons <fus...@storytotell.org> wrote:
>
> > Daniel,
>
> > I guess I have to ask... why do you need to do this in the first
> > place? :) Zip codes are already unique. Are you searching through data
> > where someone else MD5'd some zip codes to obfuscate them? Just curious.
>
> > —
> > Daniel Lyonshttp://www.storytotell.org--Tell It!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
