It's a great idea, and already in progress. ;) http://code.google.com/p/clojure-contrib/source/browse/#svn/trunk/src/clojure/contrib/test_clojure
-- Aaron On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One of the things that occurred to me at last night's Meetup is that > there seems to be a sizable group of people who are keen on > contributing to Clojure, including basic "drudge" work. It also seems > apparent that having a decent test suite is valuable (if only for the > sake of appearances and adoption), though I tend to agree that it's > not a good use of Rich's time. > > While this contribution would indeed be easier with git, I'm > disinclined to wait: I'm personally intending to take a look at the > existing tests in contrib, and if I can figure out the test framework, > I'll crank out a few tests for the core. > > If a few people did this, tests will accrue over time. > > Perhaps more importantly, if we manage to inculcate the attitude that > questions, bugs, and misunderstandings should be captured as tests, > then the important areas — edge cases and bug fixes — will grow > coverage, all without Rich wasting his time. > > Thoughts? Opinions? Advice on the test framework? Would my time be > better spent documenting what I learn about the test framework? Should > I go back to bed and get more sleep? :) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
