it would conform to "the clojure way".
On Jun 2, 8:45 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This would encourage documenting structs, so I think this is a good
> idea.
>
> Sean
>
> On Jun 2, 11:31 am, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to see defstruct take an optional docstring. Would such a
> > patch be welcome?
>
> > Stu
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
