On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Andrew Wagner <wagner.and...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You can use destructuring in your predicate's arg list: > > Not to hijack the thread but...is there some reason clojure doesn't just > just call this pattern-matching? Is it different somehow?
Why doesn't Ruby just call it destructuring like Lisp has been doing for decades? ;) (Actually I know next to nothing about Ruby and its pattern matching and not much more about Lisp.) -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
