On May 31, 1:08 am, dmiller <dmiller2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proxying and genclass haven't been attempted yet.
Can you guess how long they should take to implement? > Speed is still an issue. For basic code generation, the MSIL > produced by the ClojureCLR compiler is as close as possible to the > bytecodes produced by the Clojure(JVM) compiler. Why is it important that the MSIL is similar to the JVM bytecode? Shouldn't the compiler use techniques specific for performance on the CLR? > Overall, this release is a very large step forward in performance and > functionality. There are still enough rough edges and gaps in testing > that daily use cannot be recommended, but those wanting to play and > test will find this release much easier to deal with. Bon appetit. It'd be much easier to play with if you provide a precompiled executable :) Keep up the good work! I hope to someday use ClojureCLR for real projects, so I can have all the functional, concurrent goodness of Clojure in .NET. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
