I thought I had the latest from trunk, but I was on rev 1371. Did an
update to latest now, rev 1382. Ran the example again and it was fine
now.

-Al

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Timothy Pratley
<timothyprat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alen,
>
> I just updated to revision 1382 and it worked fine:
> Clojure 1.1.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT
> user=> (def foo 10)
> #'user/foo
> user=> (.start (Thread. (fn [] (println foo))))
> nil
> 10
>
> It also worked on whatever I was using before that. Can you confirm
> you are experiencing this behaviour in 1382?
>
>
> On May 31, 6:59 pm, Alen Ribic <alen.ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am currently reading the Programming Clojure book and have come
>> across an unexpected result for an example in section titled "Managing
>> Per-thread state with Vars".
>>
>> Code snippet is as follows (with expected result):
>>
>> user> (def foo 10)
>> #'user/foo
>>
>> user=> (.start (Thread. (fn [] (println foo))))
>> nil
>> | 10
>>
>> I tried the above using the clojure trunk version and my output is
>> that println line didn't print anything:
>>
>> user> (.start (Thread. (fn [] (println foo))))
>> nil
>>
>> However, if I try the version of clojure that accompanies the book
>> examples then the "println foo" in the new thread prints the expected
>> value of 10.
>>
>> user=> (.start (Thread. (fn [] (println foo))))
>> nil
>> | 10
>>
>> Does this make any sense? If so, why the difference?
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Alen
>>
>> PS. I'm new to clojure and I am absolutely loving it so far.
>> (Especially Clojure's very neat Concurrency API.)
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to