On 14.05.2009, at 09:22, Laurent PETIT wrote: > Isn't tree-reduce similar to clojure.contrib.generic.functor/fmap > (though fmap preserves the type of the structure, while your > function returns seqs of seqs ...) ?
fmap is not recursive. When given a list, it would only act at the top level. Moreover, fmap maps a function of one argument over a structure, it doesn't combine structures. It would be straightforward to apply fmap recursively by defining a suitable data type (such as ::tree) and providing a recursive implementation of fmap for it. > (Ah, and I find that the name reduce here is a bit misleading, > since the operation really does a mapping from a tree to another ?) Indeed. Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
