Oh, it's just significantly harder to read if you don't know clojure, that's all.
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Emeka <emekami...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why? > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Wagner <wagner.and...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Wow. Ok, yeah, I'm glad he didn't put that version in the article :) >> >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <squee...@mac.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On May 12, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Andrew Wagner wrote: >>> >>>> It seems like this idiom would be easy to implement in this macro. Or am >>>> I missing something? >>>> >>> >>> The current implementation of clojure.core/with-open works with multiple >>> bindings the way you're advocating. The one in the article makes for an >>> easier to understand example. As I recall, it's an older version before >>> Clojure changed to use vectors for binding forms pervasively. >>> >>> --Steve >>> >>> Clojure 1.1.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT >>> user=> (doc with-open) >>> ------------------------- >>> clojure.core/with-open >>> ([bindings & body]) >>> Macro >>> bindings => [name init ...] >>> >>> Evaluates body in a try expression with names bound to the values >>> of the inits, and a finally clause that calls (.close name) on each >>> name in reverse order. >>> nil >>> user=> (source with-open) >>> (defmacro with-open >>> "bindings => [name init ...] >>> >>> Evaluates body in a try expression with names bound to the values >>> of the inits, and a finally clause that calls (.close name) on each >>> name in reverse order." >>> [bindings & body] >>> (assert-args with-open >>> (vector? bindings) "a vector for its binding" >>> (even? (count bindings)) "an even number of forms in binding vector") >>> (cond >>> (= (count bindings) 0) `(do ~...@body) >>> (symbol? (bindings 0)) `(let ~(subvec bindings 0 2) >>> (try >>> (with-open ~(subvec bindings 2) ~...@body) >>> (finally >>> (. ~(bindings 0) close)))) >>> :else (throw (IllegalArgumentException. >>> "with-open only allows Symbols in bindings")))) >>> nil >>> user=> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
