Tags should now be stable and generate new revisions only when/if the subversion revision changes.
-k. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Kevin O'Neill <ke...@oneill.id.au> wrote: > yeah ... tags a a bit of a pain as the tags revision can move > underneath me. i took the conservative (and lazy) approach and update > them during the refresh cycle. i might look into improving this a > little over the weekend. > > -k. > > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: >> >> "Kevin O'Neill" <ke...@oneill.id.au> writes: >> >>> Branches and tags are now being mirrored. >> >> Looks like the release_1.0 tag is getting pushed to every hour. >> >> -Phil >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > email: ke...@oneill.id.au > web: http://kevin.oneill.id.au/ > > If you don't test then your code is only a collection of bugs which > apparently behave like a working program. > -- email: ke...@oneill.id.au web: http://kevin.oneill.id.au/ If you don't test then your code is only a collection of bugs which apparently behave like a working program. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
