Thanks for your replies.

I've always thought of "for" as a generator. Basically just a loop
that produces a lazy collection. So it actually seems very natural to
me.

But anyway, I think I shall just write my own generator function using
lazy-seq and be done with it then.

Again, thanks for offering your opinions. They were insightful.
  -Patrick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to