is the difference that (take) is indicating laziness by putting the index first?
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:09 PM, e <evier...@gmail.com> wrote: > (take) makes perfect sense the way it is, but it doesn't seem > consistent with other similar things in that many things take the > collection, first. > > consider (get), (nth), and how java interop looks. The pattern seems > to be: "(function thing argument)" ... except for (take) -- and maybe > other cases? > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
