>From one perspective I was surprised to see the 1.0 mark before figuring out which things from contrib belonged in core. (From the other it seemed like if you are ready to ask the question about 1.0, then that could be a definition of 1.0 in itself).
All I am really saying is that I agree that this is an excellent question. For new users it would simplify things greatly to get more of the contrib functionality without requiring a special namespace (that has to be downloaded separately, to boot!) Some folks had talked about splitting up contrib. I forget all the names people came up with, but one role people had in mind (and it made sense to me) is to have a staging area-like contrib. Is there a plan along these lines? Are things like the duck-streams pretty much always included in people's code? Thanks. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Rick Moynihan <rick.moyni...@gmail.com>wrote: > r 1.1) but It'd be great to see releases of these libraries that > specifically target the 1.0 release of clojure. > > Does this mean a changing role for Contrib? How will it meet the > needs of the groups 2 that > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
