On Apr 28, 5:40 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote:
> Marko Kocić <marko.ko...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Since Clojure seems like feature complete for 1.0 release, I am
> > starting to be curious what are the features planned for after 1.0
> > release?
>
> You can check the issues list:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/list
>
> These are mostly bug fixes rather than new features though.
>
> I posted a fix for #13 that validates symbols and keywords have names
> that are recognizable by the reader, but I suspect the possibility of
> breakage is too great for it to make it into 1.0:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/detail?id=13
>
> The one I'm really looking forward to is the ability to add metadata to
> fn values:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/detail?id=90
>
I've moved some of my notes on future features here:
http://clojure.org/todo
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
