Tonight Google officially announced JVM support for AppEngine: http://ru.ly/Z2 JRuby on Rails is working and Clojure/Compojure works too: http://ru.ly/74
Unfortunately threading is restricted on GAE/J. Robin On Mar 27, 9:44 am, Robin B <robi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Google will officially announce Java support for AppEngine at the end > of May at Google IO: http://ru.ly/T6 Clojure web apps will have > access to BigTable and be able to auto-scale based on load. Clojure > in the cloud! > > Robin > > On Feb 2, 2:35 pm, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote: > > > I wonder if the Classloader issues that currently affect OSGi would impact > > an app-enginestyle deployment scenario as well. My understanding of the > > issue is that each different classloader would pick up its own RT and > > compile/generate up different versions of the core classes under each > > classloader. ( I'm willing to be totally corrected here, I'm still very new > > to clojure, and the issues we're seeing under OSGi ). > > > ...and then Buffy staked Edward. The End. > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Robin <robi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am not an expert on the JVM, but I think Google's runtime will > > > disallow uploading precompiled bytecode (jar). The assumption is that > > > if you can compile it on their servers, then it is legal and therefore > > > safe. I hope they allow the use of ASM library. > > > > Obviously this is speculation, but can you foresee any corner cases > > > where Clojure's use of ASM might be considered 'unsafe' by Google? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robin > > > > On Jan 29, 9:33 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 27, 2:44 pm, Robin <robi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Under a huge assumption that Google will soon announce a 'Java > > > > > compatible' runtime forAppEngine. Could Clojure work out of the > > > > > box? Would Clojure's dynamic generation of ASM/bytecode pose a > > > > > security problem for a generic sandboxed environment? If expected > > > > > conflicts exist, what kind of adaptation would it take to port > > > > > Clojure? > > > > > I imagine ahead-of-time compiled Clojure code would pose the least > > > > challenge, at it requires no custom classloader or dynamic bytecode. > > > > Currently, AOT is enabling both untrusted applets and conversion for > > > > Android/Dalvik. > > > > > As far as dynamic bytecode, that has a lot to do with the sandbox. > > > > > Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
