Hi, 2009/4/6 Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com>
> Another question is whether we should duplicate the classes and > the .clj files in the jar or should we just compile all of them. Is > there some value to having the source there? There certainly some value for both scenario : having classes seems an absolute requirement for some libraries to work, but having .clj files is really interesting for those that want either (show-source) ... in their REPL to work (or in IDEs for jumping to a read-only syntax-colored version of the source file). But there is also certainly value in having a build with just the classes ? (Though since the whole thing is open source, it's not a problem related to rights, but maybe for some platforms such as Android, some people might want the lightest possible jar ?) Regards, -- Laurent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
