> I'd also like to get your latest thinking on your suggestions from > some time ago about clojure.contrib.lazy-seqs. If they can be > rewritten as you suggested as functions that return a new sequence > rather than as "def'd" sequences, that's strictly more powerful and > would be an improvement. (One can always use a def'd var to hold > such a function if that's desired in a particular application.)
Steve, At quick glance it looks to me that all three of the lazy-seqs should be functions. If you want me to I'll change this and add tests. Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
