I think you are right, Brad. However, I wonder though if there is a better way to define a constant. Neither the macro nor function seems clean. I like David's wrapping-the-whole-thing-in-a-let, but what if you wanted to access the value of "width" in a different file? Would one have to resort to defining a Java class (at compile time or runtime)?
Paul On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Bradbev <brad.beveri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It would seem that macros in this case should not be required. A > normal function that simply returns a constant should get inlined by > the JIT. > > Cheers, > Brad > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
