On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:00 AM, David Sletten <da...@bosatsu.net> wrote:
> [snip] > > Here's 'length' again: > (((fn [m] > ((fn [future] > (m (fn [arg] > ((future future) arg)))) > (fn [future] > (m (fn [arg] > ((future future) arg)))) )) > (fn [rec] > (fn [l] > (if (empty? l) > 0 > (inc (rec (rest l)))) ))) > '(a b c d e)) > => 5 > > And 'reverse': > (((fn [m] > ((fn [future] > (m (fn [arg] > ((future future) arg)))) > (fn [future] > (m (fn [arg] > ((future future) arg)))) )) > (fn [rec] > (fn [l] > (cond (empty? l) '() > (empty? (rest l)) (list (first l)) > :else (cons (first (rec (rest l))) > (rec (cons (first l) > (rec (rest (rec (rest l)))) )))) ))) > '(a b c d e)) > => (e d c b a) > > Breathtaking in its elegance! > Indeed! :) > > I'm going to move forward with the negotiations, but I need to know > if you, the Clojure community, are on board here. Ultimately the > decision is going to come down to whether or not you find the APRiL > 1.0 technology useful. Try it out and let me know your opinions. > I think I'll wait for APRiL 2.0. I often find that when I jump right into version 1.0 of a product, I'm made a fool! > > Aloha, > David Sletten > Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
