> I disagree. When you understand what's happening (Refs implement IFn > by dispatching, just like Vars), you see that it has nothing to do > with obtaining the value of a ref without deref, and get can't work > since it doesn't take a ref. >
Thanks for the explanation. Since get can't work because it doesn't take a ref, why should (get ref-map :a) return nil? To me, that seems like a case of failing silently. get should raise an exception when called with invalid arguments, just like every other function. Allen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
