I know I can ignore leftover part, but my concern is that exact- integer-sqrt will calculate leftover if needed or not.
Why not 2 public functions? like mzscheme's "integer-sqrt" and "integer-sqrt/remainder" On Mar 30, 9:16 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you don't care about the "leftover" portion that exact-integer-sqrt > returns, you can do something like: > (let [[floor-sqrt _] (exact-integer-sqrt n)] ...) > or (first (exact-integer-sqrt n)) > > so I didn't want to expose another function which returns only half of > the information that this one does. > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, hjlee <hj.d....@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure, I think there might be cases the error part not needed. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
