Sometimes I feel lucky to be able to take my own decisions and turn our development strategy on a dime :)))). My partners rely on me for these decisions and we never regretted one so far.
1.0 should not be too far away so your waiting is near it's end... :))) Luc On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 07:23 -0700, Elena wrote: > On Mar 17, 12:43 pm, Luc Prefontaine <lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> > wrote: > > It depends which SVN release you use. We pulled version 1242 and went to > > production with it. > > It's used in services running non stop 24/24 7 days a week. No crashes, > > no glitches, ... > > I didn't mean I don't trust the current runtime. I was referring to > language semantics whose changes could break our released codebase. > I'm going to promote a language switch in a rather conservative > environment, therefore if we'd have to keep up with the language > evolution, then my proposal would be rejected immediately. Instead > I've already sold Clojure because of its great Java interoperability > and STM support. You know: "Yes folks, we can leverage our existing > codebase and knowledge! And no more deadlocks!". If someone argues > that Clojure is not released yet, I can retort: "So what? It's just > testing code, our customers are not going to complain." ;-) > > Cheers > > > Luc Préfontaine Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
