On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Elena <egarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 16 Mar, 20:58, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For files, that would be "wait until the end of the file before complaining >> for undefined symbols, and let me arrange the defs in any order I feel most >> readable without having to think about placing those (declare) calls". > > I second your proposal.
Otherwise, for the purpose of bringing a counter argument, I find that functions naturally group together by their level of abstraction, with the lowest level of abstraction at the top and the highest at the bottom. Considering this, I will boldly claim it usually is not that difficult to put these groups in their own lib. We could, perhaps, consider it a sign (for avoiding the word "smell") that a new lib should be defined? Then, as now, we can let "declare" handle the cases where this isn't true. > > > -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
