ben schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Juli 2021 um 18:37:38 UTC+2: > You may also be able to write an instaparse grammar for EBNF (a > grammar of grammars)—Loner contains a parser-combinator-style EBNF > parser, so it's certainly do-able. >
Sure, that would work but instaparse itself already parses EBNF, so it would be kind of duplicate work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/77413602-3de8-47cd-8e96-f2ca37e99d3an%40googlegroups.com.
