"Robert M. Mather" <robert.mather....@gmail.com> writes: > It's bad UX for the canonical reader to silently accept something that > other impls reject, but people are more likely to blame the alt impl.
It isn't really bad UX, it is just unspecified behaviour that different implementations interpret differently. And if people start relying on that, they're locking themselves into an implementation, rather than a specification. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/87sg9ix2s4.fsf%40euandre.org.
