Yes, that's almost good solution and works on runtime. Almost because I would use `doseq` instead of `for`. `for` generates lazy seq.
poniedziałek, 5 października 2020 o 11:41:53 UTC+2 peter...@gmail.com napisał(a): > On Friday, 2 October 2020 at 20:38:50 UTC+1 Bost wrote: > >> I have a problem with `def` in macros. I'd like to create a bunch of >> following definitions: >> >> Also possible to do without macros: > (defn def-stuff [xs] (for [x xs] (intern *ns* (symbol x) (upper-case x)))) > This seems to work for me, if anyone knows why it's not right, I'd love to > hear. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/9825f948-efeb-426b-97fd-189f820b3e22n%40googlegroups.com.
