On Mar 13, 10:05 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <squee...@mac.com> wrote: > Should we consider changing the canonical form for ns to use vectors > for all of its sequential sub-forms?
One thing to consider: "ns" is a bit special, because :import/:use/:require/:load mimic the syntax and behavior of the functions import/use/require/load. So (:use ...) can be read, casually, as a "call". The "import" function also uses lists instead of vectors. Just muddying the waters a bit. :) I agree that vectors are, strictly speaking, the more consistent choice. But lists are not a bad choice. One could also ask for key-value arguments: (ns com.example.foo :use [clojure.contrib.duck-streams] :import [[java.util Map ArrayList]]) But I don't think there's much to gain by changing it. -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
