Am Mo., 7. Jan. 2019 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Oleksandr Shulgin < oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de>:
> > I also see that the add-watch documentation says that the watch functions > are called "whenever the reference's state *might* have been changed", but > I just wonder if this is worth documenting. > I think that for lack of a use case, documenting await for this would be over-committing. While a watcher should be robust towards no-change notifications, depending on them sounds like another code smell to me. Unless it's considered to be merely an implementation detail which is > subject to change. > As always, I don't speak for Cognitect, so feel free to pursue this at your leisure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
