Hi Alan,

On Saturday, 5 January 2019 12:25:36 UTC+5:30, Alan Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi have been very happy using Pedestal for routing <http://pedestal.io/> 
> chores.  How does this compare to Pedestal?
>

I haven't benchmarked Calfpath against Pedestal, but Reitit-ring is 
supposed to be faster than Pedestal as 
per https://github.com/metosin/reitit/blob/master/doc/performance.md and in 
my benchmarks Calfpath outperforms Reitit-ring in most use cases, so I 
guess Calfpath should be much faster than Pedestal. But again, benchmarks 
are tricky, so you should measure the candidate libraries for your actual 
use cases.


Shantanu
 

> Alan
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:50 PM Shantanu Kumar <kumar.s...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (Cross-posted on Clojure and Ring mailing lists.)
>>
>> Happy new year to all!
>>
>> I am pleased to announce Calfpath, a fast Ring-based routing library that 
>> supports flexible, à la carte request matching. It supports both 
>> macro-based and data-driven routing.
>>
>> https://github.com/kumarshantanu/calfpath
>>
>> At SAP Concur we have been using this library for over 3 years in 
>> production on REST(ish) API servers. During early 2015 when we were using 
>> Compojure, we found it was causing 4% of the total internal latency. That 
>> is when we switched to Calfpath - roughly an order of magnitude faster. The 
>> benchmarking code is included in the repo - however, you should probably 
>> test against your own use-case to determine suitability.
>>
>> The API has matured quite a bit over time and is now more stable than 
>> ever before. Among downsides, as of now Calfpath is neither bi-directional, 
>> nor ClojureScript ready.
>>
>> I would love to receive your feedback and answer any questions. Please 
>> let me know what you think.
>>
>>
>> Shantanu
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to