Absolutely not trying to propel this discussion forward, but *ackchyually *even
with the given semantics ("async-require should be used in asynchronous
code"), the better word would be "concurrent" or "multithreaded".
But I certainly didn't intend this thread to unwind so much and take away
this much time. I'm staying with Andy on this, godspeed, we're eagerly
waiting for the 1.10 release.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
