Flow reminds me a bit of a project I started in early 2015 and decided to sunset in late 2016: https://github.com/seancorfield/engine
We actually used Engine at work for a while but decided the resulting code was both harder to read and not really very idiomatic. I’ll be interested to hear how people find Flow in production – it’s a lot more focused and simpler than Engine (which is definitely a good thing! 😊 ). Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ________________________________ From: clojure@googlegroups.com <clojure@googlegroups.com> on behalf of alex <fmno...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 2:05:28 PM To: Clojure Subject: Re: An Error spec? How about using exception instances as errors? That plays pretty nicely with ex-info and (try ... (catch Exception e e)). I've built https://github.com/dawcs/flow on top of that approach and that seems like pretty good abstraction. Despite I'm not sure about CLJS. Anomalies are also great and you may check out https://github.com/dawcs/anomalies-tools for some tooling around it. But you may still need a bridge to convert exceptions caught from 3rd-party java libs into anomalies structure. And despite Cognitect roots, it doesn't feel like "official standard". пятница, 26 октября 2018 г., 4:46:54 UTC+3 пользователь Didier написал: I've started to see a pattern in my spec like this: (s/or :success string? :error ::error) And I've been tempted to create my own spec macro for this. But I also thought, maybe Spec itself should have such a spec. (s/error <success-spec> <error-spec>) What do people think? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
