Sean, your deps.edn is a golden mine. Thanks a lot for sharing it. On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 4:46:45 AM UTC+1, Didier wrote: > > I read the rationale, and I understand that we needed a way to bundle > depencies for clj and clojure cli. But in practice, I'm seeing a lot of > people move to it, away from boot or lein, and I fail to see what the end > goal really is? > > Any serious work will need a build tool of some sort. If you use lein, it > comes with its own dependency management and config. Same for boot (as far > as I know). So in practice, if I use tools.deps, I've now doubled the > number of tools I depend on. I need lein and tools.deps. > > For me, it seems the benefit would be around unified dependency config > format and maybe reuse of the resolver logic. Like say Lein and Boot and > all tools needing to specify dependencies adopted the format of tools.deps. > This would be nice, especially for source based dependencies, and dealing > with transitive dependencies in such case. > > So, is there any hope/work to adopt the format in Lein and Boot? Or what > is the end goal otherwise? > > Regards >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
