I don’t have any hard evidence about performance but when we first updated to 
the 1.10 build that generated the new bytecode, it _felt_ faster – our test 
suite seemed to run faster locally (so maybe the compiler got faster?). We have 
not seen any measurable difference in production (but we’ve had a lot of other 
changing going to production lately that have changed the performance dynamic 
of three of our servers, so any performance boost from 1.10 and the 8+ bytecode 
would likely have been swamped by other changes).

Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

________________________________
From: clojure@googlegroups.com <clojure@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Alex 
Miller <a...@puredanger.com>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 5:28:26 AM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] 1.10.0-beta4

I wouldn’t expect any. Would be interested to hear any perf differences you see 
either way though.

On Oct 26, 2018, at 4:27 AM, Piyush Katariya 
<corporate.piy...@gmail.com<mailto:corporate.piy...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Have anybody seen any perf improvements due to JDK8+ bytecode compatibility 
which this release brings ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
clojure@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/dLUUiy_RzGk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to