Achhh, just spent the last few hours fighting this unexpected behavior with s/merge, until I finally came to realize that this is what it was..
I see this thread is quite old, did anyone open a bug for it as mentioned above? @Alex, you said this was the expected behavior, but then asked to open a bug because it does not round-trip.. I am slightly confused, does the problem lie in this "expected" behavior, or does it lie in s/unform? How would such a bug be closed? Thanks, Shlomi On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 6:24:25 AM UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote: > > You can file a bug on the s/merge unform - anything that doesn't roundtrip > should be a bug. > > On the coll-of one, I thought that was just fixed in the latest spec.alpha > release (see https://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-2076) - are you > using latest there? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
