Right, but the disadvantage is that you're releasing something that's now incomplete on its own.
I'd've hoped that clojure wouldn't have become as tightly-coupled with spec (for instance), but maybe I just need to read the Rationale page more deeply. Dependency hell blows, especially if your work environment is disconnected from the global internet. Cheers, Payter. On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 3:46:43 PM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote: > > We have begun the process of breaking Clojure into more fine-grained > modules. There is no timeline for this work but we expect this to become > more common in the future so we have no plans to change this aspect of > packaging. > > The major benefit is that the modules can be released independently and at > a faster rate than core itself. For example, newer versions of spec and the > core specs libs have already been released and can be used now with Clojure > 1.9. The new clj tool and its tool.deps lib exist to help you put these > pieces together. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
