> > Turns out it does not do what I thought it would when I initially looked > at it. I would like something that does similar to possible-keyspec-typos > but kinda the reverse. Instead of reporting missing keys found in the spec, > I would like it to report keys that are present in the data but not in the > spec. I'm going to try to make some kind of gist with functions that does > this, surely the resources you linked to will be helpful as a base for that.
Den fredag 5 januari 2018 kl. 23:16:11 UTC+1 skrev Lucas Wiener: > > Ah, yes that seems to be what I want exactly. > > Thank you, I'll give it a shot. > > Den fredag 5 januari 2018 kl. 20:53:55 UTC+1 skrev Josh Tilles: >> >> I think Stu Halloway’s proof-of-concept is at least close to what you >> want: >> https://gist.github.com/stuarthalloway/f4c4297d344651c99827769e1c3d34e9. >> >> (Here’s the context >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clojure/i8Rz-AnCoa8> for that >> code, in case you were curious.) >> >> btw, you might want to take a look at the spec-provider >> <https://github.com/stathissideris/spec-provider> library, too. It’s not >> exactly what you were asking for, but I think it could help you quickly >> create (rough, approximate) specs that incorporate all witnessed keys. >> >> On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 11:49:15 AM UTC-5, Lucas Wiener wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm writing a spec for a fairly complex data structure. One thing that I >>> have identified troublesome is that I currently have no clue how "well" my >>> spec describes my data. I keep iterating the spec, thinking that I have >>> described all fields but then it turns out later that I've missed >>> something. I would love some kind of functionality that tells me which keys >>> are present in my data that are not described in my spec. I'm aware of the >>> design principle that a spec should not be limiting to having extra data >>> and I totally support that. However, at development time I think it would >>> be useful to have something that tells me "keys :x, :y, :z are not in the >>> spec" or "the spec describes a subset of the given data". Is this possible? >>> >>> Kind Regards >>> Lucas Wiener >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
